Policy

How do you solve a problem like Cancel Culture? Fighting social contagion with legal instruments can be like grasping at clouds. We think that something more potent and wide ranging is necessary. We need a change of heart.

The Culture Wars in Singapore may have just been accelerated with the repeal of s377a and with Article 156 of the constitution shifting LGBT activists' attention fully toward the public square.Here's how we think this will affect Singapore society in the months and years to come.

We've got questions on the process, logic and methods proposed when explaining what the government intends to do with S377A, and think things aren't as simple as they have been presented.

There are a multitude of issues beneath 377A that a political package must negotiate, yet no package will satisfy all parties with their demands directly opposing one another. We explore a few options for 377a’s future and examine what’s likely to go down.

Regardless takes a look at three past instances where the government has advanced controversial policy and charts how it may go about the process of repealing 377A.

We've looked at a couple of potential reasons as to why S377A might be repealed. Now we turn our attention to "when".When should the government move on 377A if it wants to do so?

In a previous piece, we examined the legislative environment around 377A to uncover why the status quo was worth disrupting. We came up short. But perhaps there are sociological, political and economic reasons as to why the PAP is looking for the best way forward

Ever heard arguments like "your kids won't become gay if my rights are recognised" or, "how does recognising gay marriage affect heterosexual marriage"?Here's why they're misguided and why the unmitigated effects of repealing of 377A will likely bring about sweeping changes.