Policy

We've got questions on the process, logic and methods proposed when explaining what the government intends to do with S377A, and think things aren't as simple as they have been presented.

There are a multitude of issues beneath 377A that a political package must negotiate, yet no package will satisfy all parties with their demands directly opposing one another. We explore a few options for 377a’s future and examine what’s likely to go down.

Regardless takes a look at three past instances where the government has advanced controversial policy and charts how it may go about the process of repealing 377A.

We've looked at a couple of potential reasons as to why S377A might be repealed. Now we turn our attention to "when".When should the government move on 377A if it wants to do so?

In a previous piece, we examined the legislative environment around 377A to uncover why the status quo was worth disrupting. We came up short. But perhaps there are sociological, political and economic reasons as to why the PAP is looking for the best way forward

Ever heard arguments like "your kids won't become gay if my rights are recognised" or, "how does recognising gay marriage affect heterosexual marriage"?Here's why they're misguided and why the unmitigated effects of repealing of 377A will likely bring about sweeping changes.

Over the years, you've probably heard the common refrain, "377A unfairly discriminates against homosexual men".There's just one problem though... It doesn't.

We've commonly heard the refrain, "It's a sin, but it shouldn't be a crime".Is that true, though?This opinion piece takes a look at some of the common arguments for repealing S377A to see if they hold water.