Regardless

In a previous piece, we examined the legislative environment around 377A to uncover why the status quo was worth disrupting. We came up short. But perhaps there are sociological, political and economic reasons as to why the PAP is looking for the best way forward

Are you ready for the battle over the definition of marriage and family to begin in Singapore?If marriage isn't adequately safeguarded in the Constitution, we guarantee that you will need to be.

Ever heard arguments like "your kids won't become gay if my rights are recognised" or, "how does recognising gay marriage affect heterosexual marriage"?Here's why they're misguided and why the unmitigated effects of repealing of 377A will likely bring about sweeping changes.

Rumors abound about what is going to happen to 377A, but the real question is "Why?".Regardless spoke to a number of legal experts to consider whether there is really a need to revise the status quo on 377A.

Over the years, you've probably heard the common refrain, "377A unfairly discriminates against homosexual men".There's just one problem though... It doesn't.

Once upon a time, sex and gender were the same. Then liberals came along and bifurcated the two. And now, as if definitions were on a merry-go-round, they're back to being the same again. But this time, they're so warped, it'll shock you.

We've commonly heard the refrain, "It's a sin, but it shouldn't be a crime".Is that true, though?This opinion piece takes a look at some of the common arguments for repealing S377A to see if they hold water.

Regardless simplifies and charts the value systems behind the two approaches to sexuality education programmes.