Regardless

Tharman Shanmugaratnam's landslide victory marks a significant transition, but it also raises pressing questions about the evolving political landscape. From tightening eligibility criteria that sideline formidable challengers to the public's growing appetite for political independence, the election results offer a nuanced glimpse into Singapore's future. As the country grapples with these complexities, this article delves into six key insights that could shape not just the presidency, but also the upcoming General Elections.

Is the rush to adopt "non-binary" categories in corporate Diversity and Inclusion policies more about virtue signaling than grounded evidence? This thought-provoking article takes a critical look at SingPost's recent D&I changes, suggesting that the drive to conform to such Western-imported ideas could be sowing division rather than unity in the workplace. Don't miss this deep dive into the unintended consequences of 'woke' corporate culture.

Dive into a comprehensive critique of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, exploring the unintended consequences of well-intentioned policies. This article dissects the fine line between uplifting marginalized groups and inadvertently reinforcing harmful stereotypes. Learn about the potential pitfalls of DEI, the impact on personal identity, and the importance of genuine efforts to assist the disadvantaged.

Looking for a quick primer on some of the most deep-seated social frustrations that Singapore faces as a nation? This is it.

Most of us have never heard of George Goh prior to his presidential bid. We take a look at the man, his motivations and what a possible vote for him could signal.

SM Tharman, has offered his service for the duties of the President. Brilliant! But not so fast. Here're some questions to think about.

We watched Regardless of Sexuality with a healthy sense of optimism that CNA would produce a balanced piece that would critically examine the nature of the LGBT Divide in Singapore. Instead, what we found was a piece replete with emotionalism, displaying unabashed bias with key terms and a failure to examine the true drivers of tension with any sincerity.

How do you solve a problem like Cancel Culture? Fighting social contagion with legal instruments can be like grasping at clouds. We think that something more potent and wide ranging is necessary. We need a change of heart.