SM Tharman, has offered his service for the duties of the President. Brilliant! But not so fast. Here're some questions to think about.

How do you solve a problem like Cancel Culture? Fighting social contagion with legal instruments can be like grasping at clouds. We think that something more potent and wide ranging is necessary. We need a change of heart.

In August '22 the government said it was looking at ways to deal with Cancel Culture. Why leave the thinking to them? Here's what we think could be done about this social phenomenon.

Cancel Culture, justifiable or abusive? Cultivate Singapore looks at how you can examine incidents of cancellation through a clear lens, and casts a vision how how Singapore can do better than normalising social bullying.

We've got questions on the process, logic and methods proposed when explaining what the government intends to do with S377A, and think things aren't as simple as they have been presented.

There are a multitude of issues beneath 377A that a political package must negotiate, yet no package will satisfy all parties with their demands directly opposing one another. We explore a few options for 377a’s future and examine what’s likely to go down.

Regardless takes a look at three past instances where the government has advanced controversial policy and charts how it may go about the process of repealing 377A.

We've looked at a couple of potential reasons as to why S377A might be repealed. Now we turn our attention to "when".When should the government move on 377A if it wants to do so?