Regardless Team

Singapore's Preferred Gender Pronoun Movement: A beacon of inclusivity or a master manipulator of language and societal norms?Gender ideologues twist language and leverages societal pressure to champion a disputed, politically-charged ideology. By framing common sense as hate speech and pushing 'inclusive' language, it places a minority's demands for affirmation above basic reality.These tactics control cultural narratives, sidelining opposing views. Engaging in pronoun culture isn't just problematic—it endorses and amplifies its extreme stance, with harm to children's well-being, women's rights, and individual freedoms.

Singapore's Article 156 aims to protect the definition of marriage from a legal challenge, but can it withstand the global tide of change or will it crumble like a house of cards?Dive into the intricacies of this landmark legislation as we explore whether can withstand the test of time and legal scrutiny.

Dive into a comprehensive critique of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives, exploring the unintended consequences of well-intentioned policies. This article dissects the fine line between uplifting marginalized groups and inadvertently reinforcing harmful stereotypes. Learn about the potential pitfalls of DEI, the impact on personal identity, and the importance of genuine efforts to assist the disadvantaged.

Looking for a quick primer on some of the most deep-seated social frustrations that Singapore faces as a nation? This is it.

We watched Regardless of Sexuality with a healthy sense of optimism that CNA would produce a balanced piece that would critically examine the nature of the LGBT Divide in Singapore. Instead, what we found was a piece replete with emotionalism, displaying unabashed bias with key terms and a failure to examine the true drivers of tension with any sincerity.

How do you solve a problem like Cancel Culture? Fighting social contagion with legal instruments can be like grasping at clouds. We think that something more potent and wide ranging is necessary. We need a change of heart.

In August '22 the government said it was looking at ways to deal with Cancel Culture. Why leave the thinking to them? Here's what we think could be done about this social phenomenon.

Are most men as lame duck as Robert the Otter claims? Is 'Weaponised Incompetence' a universal trait, or is it correct to link it mainly to gender equality discourse? And is it grounded on firm foundations?